Difference between revisions of "Phonodeik"

From Dead Media Archive
Jump to: navigation, search
(Undo revision 12509 by Egugecuge (Talk))
 
(23 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
Dayton Clarence Miller was a professor of Physics at Case School of Applied Science who had a strong interest in the components of the tonal quality sound. He had an extensive flute collection that included instruments made out of several different media. The scientist’s desire to know with medium created the highest quality sound led him to develop the Phonodeik—‘seeing sound.’ All other devices that attempted to capture sound waves suffered from noise issues. Until the invention of electronic oscillators, the Phonodeik one of the chief means of converting sound waves into visual images and thus of analyzing all manner of sounds from musical instruments to human speech. The Phonodeik codifies sound into a technical image that can be understood through mathematics. Instead of a gestalt experience of sound that is decoded by the brain through the ear, sound is filtered through the Phonodeik and transferred into light and image.  
+
[[Image:Phonodeik diagram.png|thumb|right|alt=Principal of the Phonodeik|Image 1: Principal of the Phonodeik <i>Sound Waves: Their Shape and Speed</i> p.11]]
 +
Dayton Clarence Miller was a professor of Physics at the Case School of Applied Science who had a strong interest in the components of the tonal quality of sound. Miller possessed an extensive flute collection that included instruments made out of several different media. The scientist’s desire to know which medium created the highest quality sound led him in 1908 to develop an early sonograph called the Phonodeik—‘seeing sound.’ Miller claimed that all other contemporary devices were not sensitive enough to vibrations and changes in pressure as well as suffered from noise issues (Miller, 1937, preface). Until the invention of electronic oscillators, the Phonodeik was one of the chief means of converting sound waves into visual images and thus of analyzing all manner of sounds from musical instruments to human speech. The Phonodeik codifies sound into a technical image that can be understood through mathematics. Instead of a gestalt experience of sound that is decoded by the brain through the ear, sound is filtered through the Phonodeik and transferred into light and image. Crary’s (1990) argument that photography helped to change the human consciousness finds weight when considering the Phonodeik. Optical devices were not just instruments of visuality, but rationalizations for changing the human faculty of sight. Therefore the Phonodeik was a development that changed the way that humans perceived sound. The observer is changed by the technique of ‘listening’ through image.
  
==Changing from Sound to Image==
+
==Sound Waves==
 +
[[Image:Soundwaves.jpg|thumb|right|alt=Photographs of Sound Waves|Image 2: Photographs of sound waves created by the Phonodeik <i>Sound Waves: Their Shape and Speed</i>]]
  
The motivations behind embodying sound via the image imply that the resolution of touch difference (Fechner’s law) is sharper in terms of the image as compared to sound. Therefore the conversion of sound waves into an image is an attempt to extend the sense of sight to extrapolate it into the world of sounds to gain in-depth understanding. D.C. Miller based his analysis of sound on Ohm’s Law of Tonal quality and Fourier’s Theorem. Known as harmonic analysis, a simple tone can be split into a series of sine curves when sound is displayed graphically. Composite tones—sounds that involve multiple tones—are representations of the harmonic elements within each unit. Therefore they are not perfect sine curves but rather jagged curves.  
+
Miller was interested in studying the different parts of a sound wave: amplitude (loudness), frequency (tone), and shape (timber)--which is by far the most subjective of the measurements. ''Image 1'' displays the principals and aspects of a Phonodeik. There was no standardized physical object, but the principals behind the design remained the same. 'H' represents the horn that captures sound and funnels it to a glass diaphragm ('D') that vibrates with the noise. One of the major design flaws comes with the horn. As all physical objects vibrate and therefore make sound, the users of this device would have to make sure that the horn they choose has a deeper fundamental tone than the phenomenon they are studying. The middle of the diaphragm is attached by silk threads to a pulley and a spring ('S'). The spring keeps the silk taunt at all times, and the pulley will move a mirror ('M') that is attached by a steel spindle when the diaphragm vibrates. 'P' represents a pin hole of focused light that is fed through a lens ('L') to hit the mirror. When the mirror would move, it would reflect a moving beam of light onto photo paper or 'film' to capture the sound waves. The only portion of the device that was typically ‘black boxed’ was the area that holds the material substrate, photo paper, due to its sensitivity to light (Miller, pp. 10-11).
  
Miller believed that mathematics could be applied to assess tonal elements and quality. As evidenced by Flusser’s essays, Non-Thing 1 and 2, argue that an infromatized society will inhabit a bit-like, atomic-like universe.  Therefore the information captured by the phonodiek can be segmented in time. While the technology is analogue because it produces a continuous image over time, similar to a film, the output for a Phonodeik can be split up into discrete units: sine curves. The main paradigm of that time period was that media is serial and should be read and consumed in that order.  But with the digitization of information, seriality played less of a role. The Phonodeik captured a cacophony of sounds that happened simultaneously. Miller desired to parse out the different tones.
+
==Changing from Sound to Image==
  
==Sound Waves==
+
The motivations behind embodying sound via the image imply that the resolution of a perceivable difference (Fechner’s law of 'touch difference') is sharper in terms of the eye as compared to the ear. Therefore the conversion of sound waves into an image is an attempt to extend the sense of sight to gain in-depth understanding of how changes in pressure create audible sound. D.C. Miller based his analysis of sound on Ohm’s Law of Tonal quality and Fourier’s Theorem (Miller, p.8). Known as harmonic analysis, a simple tone can be split into a series of sine curves when sound is displayed graphically. Composite tones—sounds that involve multiple tones—are representations of the harmonic elements within each unit or sound wave. Therefore they are not perfect sine curves but rather complex curves.
  
Miller was interested in studying the different parts of a sound wave: amplitude (loudness), frequency (tone), and shape (timber) which is by far the most subjective of the measurements. A glass diaphragm vibrates with the noise that helps to crease image. One of the major design flaws comes with the Horn. As all physical objects vibrate and therefore make sound, the users of this device would have to make sure that the horn they chose would have a deeper fundamental tone that what they were studying. The only portion of the device that was ‘black boxed’ was the area that holds the material substrate, photo paper, due to its sensitivity to light.  
+
Miller believed that mathematics can be applied to assess tonal elements and quality. Flusser’s essays, "Non-Thing 1" and "Non-Thing 2", argue that society places a high priority on information and we will eventually inhabit a bit-like, atomic-like universe.  Machines begin to do the work of transforming nature into information. Sound must be objectified before Miller could locate analyzable and quantifiable information.  The photo paper as an artifact is secondary to the waves produced.  
 +
 
 +
Therefore the information captured by the Phonodiek can be segmented in time. While the technology is analogue because it produces a continuous image over time, similar to a film, the output for a Phonodeik can be split up into discrete units: sine curves. The main paradigm of that time period was that media is serial and should be read and consumed in that order.  But with the digitization of information, seriality played less of a role. The Phonodeik captured a cacophony of sounds that happened simultaneously. Miller desired to parse out the different tones.
  
 
==Optics==
 
==Optics==
  
The interplay between catoptrics and dioptrics is extensive and elucidating in this device. The Phonodeik translates sound waves from a dioptric medium that is the air, and transfers them to a catoptrics medium. Not does the photo paper not allow for light to pass through it, but that when light hits it, records the sound waves. But the waves that are recorded themselves are dioptric because it functions as a lens that allows humans to conceptualize sound.  
+
[[Image:Fludd's Sun.jpg|thumb|right|alt=Fludd's Sun|Image 3: Fludd's dynamic triangles with the sun in the middle linking harmonics and light <i>Deep Time of Media</i> p.106]]
 +
The interplay between catoptrics and dioptrics as discussed by Zielinski (2006) is extensive and elucidating in the Phonodeik. The artifact translates sound waves from a dioptric medium, the air, and transfers them to a catoptric medium, paper. Because photo paper is catoptric and reflects light it is able to record the sound through chemical properties. But the information captured, waves, are dioptric because they are a 'lens' that allows humans to conceptualize sound.
  
If you see Figure 1: there is a sketch of how the Phonodeik functions. There is a large horn that captures the sound and at the smaller end that is funneled sound, there is a thin glass diaphragm that vibrates. Silk string connects the diaphragm to a pulley that is help tight when there is no vibration with help of a spring. There is a source of light that is focused and shined into a mirror will vibrate whenever the silk string moves. The light, focused first through a lens, bounces off of the mirror and on to the photographic paper. The source of light is rarely identified and gives the idea of an omnipotent power shining light down. This light source is focused through a dioptric lens and then lends itself to bounce off the also dioptric mirror. Finally the light does hit the aforementioned catropic material substrate.  
+
Image 1: displays the duel role of light within the device itself. The pinhole of light ('P'), is focused first through a lens, bounces off of the mirror and on to the photographic paper. The source of light is not identified and is reminiscent of an omnipotent power shining light down on the earth, or lumen. This light source is focused through a dioptric lens and then bounces off the dioptric mirror—lumen as a reflection of the source lux. Finally the light does hit the aforementioned catropic material substrate. The mirror’s vibrations and movement in light connects the world of sound and sight.
The mirror’s vibrations and movement in light connects the world of sound and sight the only black box has to do with the photographic paper being protected from light sources other than the reflected light from the mirror.
+
  
 +
The Phonodeik can be seen as a remediation of the ideas of Robert Fludd who “sought cohesion for the strands of natural philosophy... in a single idea that was not overtly articulated in things themselves but constituent their hidden structure and driving force" (Zielinski, p.102). By playing a monochord to create harmonic series, he was able to utilize geometry and arithmetic to examine the mathematical relations of music. Fludd drew a connection between musical intervals, small ratios of whole numbers, to the Pythagorean doctrine. As seen in Image 3, Fludd had a unifying theory of the universe that involved the world being composed of two intersecting triangles--a sign of the holy trinity and therefore the divine--with the sun in the center. These represent the divine and the material in the world. Here light plays a major role in understanding the harmony of life. Also Fludd and later Miller reject Aristotle's notion that understanding music can be done only through intuition because the ear has limited capabilities of discernment. The debate between division of musical tones is still a modern issue with the computerization of sound for musical production (Zielinski, pp. 104-109).
  
 
==References==
 
==References==
  
Casler, Herman. Mutoscope. Patent 683,910. 8 Oct 1901. Web. 27 Mar 2010. PDF.
+
Crary, J. (1990). ''Techniques of the observer: On vision and modernity in the nineteenth century.'' Cambridge: MIT Press.
 +
 
 +
Flusser, V. (1999). ''The shape of things: A philosophy of design''. London: Reaktion Books.  
  
Crary, Jonathan. ''Techniques of the Oberver: On Vision and Modernity in the Nineteenth Century''. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press, 1990. Print.
+
Miller, C. W. (1937). ''Sound waves: Their shape and speed.'' New York: The MacMillan Company.
  
Flusser, Vilém. ''The Shape of Things: A Philosophy of Design''. London: Reaktion Books Ltd., 1999. Print.  
+
Zielinski, S. (2006). ''Deep time of the media: Toward an Archaeology of hearing and seeing by technical means''. Stanford: Standford University Press.
  
Gitelman, Lisa. ''Scripts, Grooves, and Writing Machines: Representing Technology in the Edison Era''. Stanford, California: Standford University Press, 1999. Print.
+
[[Category:Visuality]]
 +
[[Category:Sound]]
  
 +
[[Category:Dossier]]
  
"TOPICS OF THE TIMES." ''New York Times'' (1857-1922)  28  Jan. 1898,ProQuest Historical Newspapers The New York Times (1851 - 2006), ProQuest. Web.  27 Mar. 2010.
+
[[Category:Spring 2010]]

Latest revision as of 10:52, 24 November 2010

Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination
Image 1: Principal of the Phonodeik Sound Waves: Their Shape and Speed p.11

Dayton Clarence Miller was a professor of Physics at the Case School of Applied Science who had a strong interest in the components of the tonal quality of sound. Miller possessed an extensive flute collection that included instruments made out of several different media. The scientist’s desire to know which medium created the highest quality sound led him in 1908 to develop an early sonograph called the Phonodeik—‘seeing sound.’ Miller claimed that all other contemporary devices were not sensitive enough to vibrations and changes in pressure as well as suffered from noise issues (Miller, 1937, preface). Until the invention of electronic oscillators, the Phonodeik was one of the chief means of converting sound waves into visual images and thus of analyzing all manner of sounds from musical instruments to human speech. The Phonodeik codifies sound into a technical image that can be understood through mathematics. Instead of a gestalt experience of sound that is decoded by the brain through the ear, sound is filtered through the Phonodeik and transferred into light and image. Crary’s (1990) argument that photography helped to change the human consciousness finds weight when considering the Phonodeik. Optical devices were not just instruments of visuality, but rationalizations for changing the human faculty of sight. Therefore the Phonodeik was a development that changed the way that humans perceived sound. The observer is changed by the technique of ‘listening’ through image.

Sound Waves

Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination
Image 2: Photographs of sound waves created by the Phonodeik Sound Waves: Their Shape and Speed

Miller was interested in studying the different parts of a sound wave: amplitude (loudness), frequency (tone), and shape (timber)--which is by far the most subjective of the measurements. Image 1 displays the principals and aspects of a Phonodeik. There was no standardized physical object, but the principals behind the design remained the same. 'H' represents the horn that captures sound and funnels it to a glass diaphragm ('D') that vibrates with the noise. One of the major design flaws comes with the horn. As all physical objects vibrate and therefore make sound, the users of this device would have to make sure that the horn they choose has a deeper fundamental tone than the phenomenon they are studying. The middle of the diaphragm is attached by silk threads to a pulley and a spring ('S'). The spring keeps the silk taunt at all times, and the pulley will move a mirror ('M') that is attached by a steel spindle when the diaphragm vibrates. 'P' represents a pin hole of focused light that is fed through a lens ('L') to hit the mirror. When the mirror would move, it would reflect a moving beam of light onto photo paper or 'film' to capture the sound waves. The only portion of the device that was typically ‘black boxed’ was the area that holds the material substrate, photo paper, due to its sensitivity to light (Miller, pp. 10-11).

Changing from Sound to Image

The motivations behind embodying sound via the image imply that the resolution of a perceivable difference (Fechner’s law of 'touch difference') is sharper in terms of the eye as compared to the ear. Therefore the conversion of sound waves into an image is an attempt to extend the sense of sight to gain in-depth understanding of how changes in pressure create audible sound. D.C. Miller based his analysis of sound on Ohm’s Law of Tonal quality and Fourier’s Theorem (Miller, p.8). Known as harmonic analysis, a simple tone can be split into a series of sine curves when sound is displayed graphically. Composite tones—sounds that involve multiple tones—are representations of the harmonic elements within each unit or sound wave. Therefore they are not perfect sine curves but rather complex curves.

Miller believed that mathematics can be applied to assess tonal elements and quality. Flusser’s essays, "Non-Thing 1" and "Non-Thing 2", argue that society places a high priority on information and we will eventually inhabit a bit-like, atomic-like universe. Machines begin to do the work of transforming nature into information. Sound must be objectified before Miller could locate analyzable and quantifiable information. The photo paper as an artifact is secondary to the waves produced.

Therefore the information captured by the Phonodiek can be segmented in time. While the technology is analogue because it produces a continuous image over time, similar to a film, the output for a Phonodeik can be split up into discrete units: sine curves. The main paradigm of that time period was that media is serial and should be read and consumed in that order. But with the digitization of information, seriality played less of a role. The Phonodeik captured a cacophony of sounds that happened simultaneously. Miller desired to parse out the different tones.

Optics

Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination
Image 3: Fludd's dynamic triangles with the sun in the middle linking harmonics and light Deep Time of Media p.106

The interplay between catoptrics and dioptrics as discussed by Zielinski (2006) is extensive and elucidating in the Phonodeik. The artifact translates sound waves from a dioptric medium, the air, and transfers them to a catoptric medium, paper. Because photo paper is catoptric and reflects light it is able to record the sound through chemical properties. But the information captured, waves, are dioptric because they are a 'lens' that allows humans to conceptualize sound.

Image 1: displays the duel role of light within the device itself. The pinhole of light ('P'), is focused first through a lens, bounces off of the mirror and on to the photographic paper. The source of light is not identified and is reminiscent of an omnipotent power shining light down on the earth, or lumen. This light source is focused through a dioptric lens and then bounces off the dioptric mirror—lumen as a reflection of the source lux. Finally the light does hit the aforementioned catropic material substrate. The mirror’s vibrations and movement in light connects the world of sound and sight.

The Phonodeik can be seen as a remediation of the ideas of Robert Fludd who “sought cohesion for the strands of natural philosophy... in a single idea that was not overtly articulated in things themselves but constituent their hidden structure and driving force" (Zielinski, p.102). By playing a monochord to create harmonic series, he was able to utilize geometry and arithmetic to examine the mathematical relations of music. Fludd drew a connection between musical intervals, small ratios of whole numbers, to the Pythagorean doctrine. As seen in Image 3, Fludd had a unifying theory of the universe that involved the world being composed of two intersecting triangles--a sign of the holy trinity and therefore the divine--with the sun in the center. These represent the divine and the material in the world. Here light plays a major role in understanding the harmony of life. Also Fludd and later Miller reject Aristotle's notion that understanding music can be done only through intuition because the ear has limited capabilities of discernment. The debate between division of musical tones is still a modern issue with the computerization of sound for musical production (Zielinski, pp. 104-109).

References

Crary, J. (1990). Techniques of the observer: On vision and modernity in the nineteenth century. Cambridge: MIT Press.

Flusser, V. (1999). The shape of things: A philosophy of design. London: Reaktion Books.

Miller, C. W. (1937). Sound waves: Their shape and speed. New York: The MacMillan Company.

Zielinski, S. (2006). Deep time of the media: Toward an Archaeology of hearing and seeing by technical means. Stanford: Standford University Press.